- Kim Kardashian: I'd like to marry this dude and spend $10 million dollars on a publicity wedding please oh and then 72 days later I'd like a divorce
- America: Well sure why not?
- Britney Spears: I want to get hitched in a chapel in Vegas and have the marriage annulled fifty-five hours later because I didn't know what the hell I was doing
- America: Whatever you want!
- Carmen Electra: I want to get married in Vegas to this basketball player and then annul the marriage nine days later cuz we were both drunk lololololololololol
- America: Okay, sounds like fun!
- Gay couple: We would like to get married and spend our lives together and possibly adopt unwanted children to give them a good home and -
- America: WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU IDIOTS THAT IS DISGUSTING AND WRONG YOU DEFILE THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE SO GTFO
(Source: penguin-daze123)
Taking place in England the owners of the yard slowly kept adding sections to the contraption so when the squirrel learned one section and got the nuts, they’d add another section. It took over 2 weeks to get to the final product you see in the video.
DAMN!
(Source: thedandyunderworld)
(Source: mochacafe.net)
(Source: kcabanikova)
(Source: justshufflin)
(Source: dangerouslyoriginalblog)
The following essay, of sorts, is the written compilation of a number of thoughts and ideas I’ve had over the last couple of years about the nature of choice, and the possible existence of fate. I’m no scientist, nor a qualified philosopher, but it’s my hope that these writings may be insightful, or at least worthy of discussion. If you, the reader, have engaged in proper study of the topic at a university or otherwise, please tell me if I’ve gotten anything drastically wrong, or if the whole premise is GIGO to begin with. Because, as I said before, I’m no scientist/philosopher. I guess this could be considered my “thesis” of sorts, upon the subject.
Before we can answer the question of whether or not choice exists, we need to examine exactly what choice is. First of all, choice is not random. Even the most insignificant of choices contains a hidden bias. I tested this by asking what now amounts to tens, perhaps even over 100 people, to; say a number, colour, and a tool. Practically all of them answered a one digit number, a primary colour, and either a hammer or screwdriver. These were the answers I predicted when I made my hypothesis that people would almost always choose the easiest and most obvious option when asked to decide randomly between insignificant options. From this, I could conclude that people weren’t capable of making fully random choices. Part of the problem is that, the concept of “random” does not in fact, exist.
Origami Font by Guan Pucha
Chinese characters constructed with folding paper:
Character and paper, paper and character.
Through the special method of paper folding to make the covert from paper to character, this is feasible for the Chinese character that with long history and complicated.
(Source: perch-patchwork)











